The 2016 special legislative session is behind us and, baring any “Black Swan” events, Kansas legislators will not find themselves doing the people’s business until 2017.
As this year’s legislative activity is in the books, so is the 2016 Kansas Freedom Index. It is inclusive of one additional vote in the Kansas Senate and the lifetime votes have been updated accordingly. The Senate voted on SCR 1602 in the special session and this constitutional amendment would have demanded that schools stay open amidst possible court or legislative kerfuffles. It would have insured the rights of students to pursue their educational interests regardless of judicial/legislative activity.
Click here to view the full 2016 Kansas Freedom Index, learn more of the history of the project, and view Lifetime scores.
The guide is a one-stop shop for the impact that a selection of legislative votes have on your ability to run your business, live your life, and raise your family as you see fit. It is the product of nonpartisan analysis, study, and research and is not intended to directly or indirectly endorse or oppose any candidate for public office.
The printed version of the KFI will be available directly on the website as a PDF. Or, click here to e-mail KPI and we’ll send you a copy in the mail as soon as they are printed.
You might hear that certain legislation was passed or voted down, but it is often difficult to know whether your legislator voted in accordance with the promises made on your doorstep. The KFI seeks to fill some of those gaps by capturing the economic and educational freedom votes in the legislative session. This is the second year in which we’ve included a “Lifetime Score” for sitting legislators who have served in at least two sessions.
Several trends have emerged over the years that are evident this year as well. The first and foremost is that political party has little, if anything, to do with the score a legislator receives in the Index. For example, within a range of ±44 in the House, scores for Republicans ranged from a high of 38 to a low of minus 14; twelve Republicans actually have negative scores. In the Senate, the Republican scores ranged from a high of 34 to a low of minus 5 within a range of ±42; five Republicans have negative scores. Too many legislators seem motivated by political opportunity and convenience rather than an adherence to good government, trusting Kansans to run their own lives, and solid economics.
Maybe it was the shortness of the regular session but this year was also limited in the way some bills were ultimately scored. For instance, the much-discussed voter empowerment bill on local property taxes (HB 2088) resulted in a neutral score. This bill was vital – even if it has wrongly been called a “property tax lid” – but because of the compromises necessary to get it signed into law the bill had provisions with a negative impact on economic freedom and other provisions with a positive impact. Thus, the bill is not included in the KFI even though it will have a significant impact on the ability of local voters to control their property tax bill.
HB 2615 was a mash up of multiple bills that would have received a score but, it turns out, is neutral. Provisions to allow for more charity care have a positive impact on consumer-driven health care while demands for government licensure of acupuncturists erode the ability of practitioners of Traditional Chinese Medicine to help patients. Parliamentary necessity aside, these sort of tactics to move things through the legislative process can muddy the waters of an effort like the KFI. More importantly, they make it harder for the average Kansan to fully grasp what is truly happening in the statehouse.
For a complete history of the KFI, and for a further explanation of methodology and explainers, please visit the full Freedom Index page here.
Any given bill could be argued for or against inclusion but, taken as a whole, the 2016 Kansas Freedom Index can help all Kansans achieve a better understanding of how much their elected officials in Topeka support student-focused education and economic freedom.